Papers › LLM Output Detectability and Task Performance Can be Jointly Optimized

LLM Output Detectability and Task Performance Can be Jointly Optimized

2 May 2026arXiv:2605.01350added by Syntology

Koshiro Saito, Ryuto Koike, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Detecting machine-generated text is essential for transparency and accountability when deploying LLMs. Watermarking enables statistically reliable detection by biasing token distributions to embed detectable signals into LLM outputs. However, it has been reported that watermarked LLMs often perform worse on downstream tasks. We propose PUPPET, a framework that fine-tunes an LLM via DPO to generate text that is both more detectable by a target detector and better performing on downstream tasks. We use two rewards: a detector that outputs a machine-class likelihood and an evaluator that measures a task-specific metric. Just as a watermark is verified with its secret key, this detector-specific design lets an LLM provider track how its published model is used. Experiments on long-form QA, summarization, and essay writing show that LLMs trained with PUPPET achieve detectability competitive with watermarking methods---even at strict low FPRs---while outperforming them on downstream tasks. Moreover, this optimization requires only a few thousand samples and 1--2 GPU hours, and its gains hold across out-of-domain tasks, six detectors of diverse architectures, and different LLM families and sizes, and are even robust to paraphrasing attacks.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from pakapaka333/PUPPET. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.01350, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections