Papers › NLPOpt-Net: A Learning Method for Nonlinear Optimization with Feasibility Guarantees
NLPOpt-Net: A Learning Method for Nonlinear Optimization with Feasibility Guarantees
Bimol Nath Roy, Rahul Golder, MM Faruque Hasan
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Nonlinear Parametric Optimization Network (NLPOpt-Net) is an unsupervised learning architecture to solve constrained nonlinear programs (NLP). Given the structure of an NLP, it learns the parametric solution maps with guaranteed constraint satisfaction. The architecture consists of a backbone neural network (NN) followed by a multilayer (k-layered) projection. While the NN drives toward optimality through a loss function consisting of a modified Lagrangian augmented with a consistency loss, the projection ensures feasibility by projecting the NN predictions in the original constraint manifold. Instead of typical distance minimization, our projection exploits local quadratic approximations of the original NLP. Under certain conditions (such as convexity), the projection has a descent property, which improves the NN predictions further. NLPOpt-Net deploys an inversion-free, modified Chambolle-Pock algorithm to solve the constrained quadratic projections during the forward pass and uses the implicit function theorem for efficient backpropagation. The fixed structure of the projection further allows decoupling of the NN and the projection once the training is complete. NLPOpt-Net solves large-scale convex QP, QCQP, NLP, and nonconvex problems with near zero optimality gap and constraint violations reduced to machine precision. Additionally, it provides near accurate prediction of the active sets and corresponding dual variables, thereby enabling a scalable approach for multiparametric programming. Compiling the projection in C provides order of magnitude improvement in inference time compared to JAX. We provide the codes and NLPOpt-Net as a ready to use package that includes GPU support.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2605.00260")
Code
Syntology Ran 16 of 23 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 11 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 23 samples from 1 repository, 16 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
23 samples harvested; 16 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 23 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from souls-tamu/nlpoptnet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
19adf70ac466f7f3 · report
6c6efb63f584e18a · report
09cdd98635880c68 · report
c0355ddf23075832 · report
037f448a77c01b19 · report
295fb68ea0ac689c · report
e648a6e4040548f8 · report
fe7029cfa054529a · report
a5f41d42ed046759 · report
90f5abfa450f6151 · report
bd8fbcb0c44e9951 · report
7236e74d015f0256 · report
55349d67e26f7ba5 · report
e040cda34782cc35 · report
7c151df86ae840e0 · report
2cc77b1530e454ee · report
16a809cfd7a86382 · report
eb18cdd5625babbf · report
55d5c5b12f3b7133 · report
27f21d2abb42bac1 · report
49228e83d5df9126 · report
95a6fe45248a39a5 · report
83a9f72da6693d18 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2605.00260, was issued in May 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections