Papers › Differentiable latent structure discovery for interpretable forecasting in clinical time series
Differentiable latent structure discovery for interpretable forecasting in clinical time series
Ivan Lerner, Jean Feydy, Alexandre Kalimouttou, Anita Burgun, Francis Bach
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Background: We introduce StructGP, a continuous-time multi-task Gaussian process that couples process convolutions with differentiable structure learning to uncover a sparse, ordered directed acyclic graph (DAG) of inter-variable dependencies while preserving principled uncertainty. We further propose LP-StructGP, which augments StructGP with latent pathways-shared, temporally shifted trajectories inferred via subject-specific coupling filters and a softmax gating mechanism-to capture cross-patient progression patterns. Both models are trained under sparsity and acyclicity constraints using scalable low-rank updates using likelihood-based objectives. Results: In simulations, graph recovery improved with cohort size, with the median Structural Hamming Distance reaching zero at the largest cohort size, while pathway assignments showed high Adjusted Rand Index. Our analysis establishes that the ordered StructGP graph is identifiable from the population marginal likelihood. On a MIMIC-IV septic shock cohort (n=1,008; norepinephrine, creatinine, mean blood pressure), StructGP improves short-horizon (6 h) forecasting over independent-task baselines (average RMSE 0.68 [95% CI: 0.63-0.74] vs. 0.88 [0.83-0.94]) and, with 15 additional inputs, markedly outperforms unstructured kernels (0.63 [0.58-0.69] vs. 3.02 [2.85-3.18]) with superior calibration (coverage 0.96 vs. 0.84). For long horizons (up to 6 days), LP-StructGP further reduces error for creatinine (RMSE 0.95 [0.88-1.03] vs. 1.17 [1.08-1.25]) and improves overall coverage (0.93 [0.93-0.94] vs. 0.91 [0.91-0.92]). On the PhysioNet Challenge, StructGP attains competitive accuracy (MAE 3.72e-2) relative to a strong published graph neural model. Conclusion: These results show that structured process convolutions with latent pathways deliver interpretable, scalable, and well-calibrated forecasting for irregular clinical time series.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2604.27967")
Code
Syntology Ran 17 of 18 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 17 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 18 samples from 1 repository, 17 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
18 samples harvested; 17 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 18 of the 18 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from yalavarthivk/GraFITi. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
4a8620fc2db04474 · report
726f63c5d8d8e2c7 · report
0286ba94d7f741aa · report
1406fa2cb89ec513 · report
363b7a0690754d6a · report
a02367a938d20d4d · report
48c047f5225a3300 · report
2ba5cb1a7937a316 · report
8db261d0c2908907 · report
1749069af0b9d37e · report
eb94e5217cc35d4e · report
c4b979466c3f0695 · report
79b441530285ad17 · report
2e9dede6592a9d91 · report
16c21c5c9315cd0b · report
59283ce5fd24a2fa · report
73beb865ec22064c · report
76fc67dca4a2d53c · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.27967, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections