Papers › VibroML: an automated toolkit for high-throughput vibrational analysis and dynamic...

VibroML: an automated toolkit for high-throughput vibrational analysis and dynamic instability remediation of crystalline materials using machine-learned potentials

30 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.27685added by Syntology

Rogério Almeida Gouvêa, Gian-Marco Rignanese

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

While machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) accelerate phonon dispersion calculations, merely identifying dynamical instabilities in computationally predicted materials is insufficient; automated pathways to resolve them are required. We introduce VibroML, an open-source Python toolkit driven by foundational MLIPs that shifts the paradigm from stability verification to automated structural remediation. VibroML employs an energy-guided genetic algorithm that vastly outperforms traditional soft-mode following, efficiently navigating the potential energy surface to uncover diverse, dynamically stable polymorphs. As 0 K harmonic stability does not guarantee macroscopic viability, an automated molecular dynamics workflow evaluates finite-temperature structural retention. VibroML also couples with ProtoCSP, our combinatorial structure prediction engine, to stabilize frustrated crystal topologies via targeted alloying, successfully rescuing functional perovskite networks like Cs₂KInI₆ and KTaSe₃. Demonstrating broader applicability, we mined the Alexandria database -- where ~50% of quaternary and 99.5% of quinary elemental combinations lack any structural entries -- to identify thousands of abandoned, high-symmetry stoichiometries. Deploying ProtoCSP's "cold start" retrieval and VibroML's evolutionary search on a sample, we successfully identified dynamically stable low-symmetry candidates. Through integrated structural remediation, thermal validation, and systematic compositional exploration, VibroML enables a comprehensive deep-screening approach, yielding physically sound structural propositions that far surpass standard high-throughput workflows.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

28 samples harvested; 26 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 21 of the 28 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.27685, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections