Papers › Analysing Lightweight Large Language Models for Biomedical Named Entity Recognition on...

Analysing Lightweight Large Language Models for Biomedical Named Entity Recognition on Diverse Ouput Formats

27 Mar 2026arXiv:2604.25920added by Syntology

Pierre Epron, Adrien Coulet, Mehwish Alam

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Despite their strong linguistic capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs) are computationally demanding and require substantial resources for fine-tuning, which is unadapted to privacy and budget constraints of many healthcare settings. To address this, we present an experimental analysis focused on Biomedical Named Entity Recognition using lightweight LLMs, we evaluate the impact of different output formats on model performance. The results reveal that lightweight LLMs can achieve competitive performance compared to the larger models, highlighting their potential as lightweight yet effective alternatives for biomedical information extraction. Our analysis shows that instruction tuning over many distinct formats does not improve performance, but identifies several format consistently associated with better performance.

PaperPDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

PierreEpron/MF-NER found in paper text by Syntologynot reachable when probed 2026-09-16 — repositories for recent papers often appear after camera-ready report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.25920, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections