Papers › OS-SPEAR: A Toolkit for the Safety, Performance,Efficiency, and Robustness Analysis of...

OS-SPEAR: A Toolkit for the Safety, Performance,Efficiency, and Robustness Analysis of OS Agents

27 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.24348added by Syntology

Zheng Wu, Yi Hua, Zhaoyuan Huang, Chenhao Xue, Yijie Lu, Pengzhou Cheng, Zongru Wu, Lingzhong Dong, Gongshen Liu, Xinghao Jiang, Zhuosheng Zhang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The evolution of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has shifted the focus from text generation to active behavioral execution, particularly via OS agents navigating complex GUIs. However, the transition of these agents into trustworthy daily partners is hindered by a lack of rigorous evaluation regarding safety, efficiency, and multi-modal robustness. Current benchmarks suffer from narrow safety scenarios, noisy trajectory labeling, and limited robustness metrics. To bridge this gap, we propose OS-SPEAR, a comprehensive toolkit for the systematic analysis of OS agents across four dimensions: Safety, Performance, Efficiency, and Robustness. OS-SPEAR introduces four specialized subsets: (1) a S(afety)-subset encompassing diverse environment- and human-induced hazards; (2) a P(erformance)-subset curated via trajectory value estimation and stratified sampling; (3) an E(fficiency)-subset quantifying performance through the dual lenses of temporal latency and token consumption; and (4) a R(obustness)-subset that applies cross-modal disturbances to both visual and textual inputs. Additionally, we provide an automated analysis tool to generate human-readable diagnostic reports. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 22 popular OS agents using OS-SPEAR. Our empirical results reveal critical insights into the current landscape: notably, a prevalent trade-off between efficiency and safety or robustness, the performance superiority of specialized agents over general-purpose models, and varying robustness vulnerabilities across different modalities. By providing a multidimensional ranking and a standardized evaluation framework, OS-SPEAR offers a foundational resource for developing the next generation of reliable and efficient OS agents. The dataset and codes are available at https://github.com/Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2604.24348")

Code

Syntology Ran 10 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 9 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 10 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 10 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
9ran

Licence: 10 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

calculate_f1_score Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/eval/eval_single.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · honoured contract fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 6ab14682c87e7bce · report
extract_point Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/eval/eval_single.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 6a1b8329e5eb58f2 · report
parse_action_type Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/eval/eval_single.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 182ea30fe35445e7 · report
parse_txt_log Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/construct/P_subset.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 2558a78be5cf41fc · report
read_text Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/report/evaluate.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 4c644a9a6cf99165 · report
safe_drop Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/report/evaluate.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · d2545774aed5c26f · report
safe_float Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/report/evaluate.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 32350ee94c299bb0 · report
transfer_qwen3vl2atlas Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/eval/transfer.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 1f7ef3ea8b87966c · report
transfer_tars15toatlas Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/eval/transfer.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · ed306c09be100acc · report
transfer_tars2atlas Wuzheng02/OS-SPEAR/eval/transfer.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 162e08ed7676f726 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.24348, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections