Papers › Architecture-Induced Recoverability Bias in Differentiable Symbolic Regression
Architecture-Induced Recoverability Bias in Differentiable Symbolic Regression
Chakshu Gupta, Theodore J. LaGrow
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Symbolic regression aims to recover closed-form expressions from numerical data, but in differentiable symbolic regression the recovered expression depends not only on the grammar but also on the fixed architecture through which variables are routed during training. This is relevant to signal-processing settings in which closed-form models and interpretable nonlinear structure are useful. This architecture-specific effect has rarely been isolated directly, because existing comparisons often vary architecture together with operator family, grammar, or search procedure. Three depth-3 architectures are compared across twenty-four operator--shape--leaf combinations, holding operator family, grammar, and training protocol fixed as far as possible while varying the variable-routing architecture. Recovery changes from 0/64 to 64/64 trials on the same target under an architecture-plus-native-training-protocol comparison. The best architecture on one target is the worst on another, and trees with two equal-depth subtrees fail in every configuration tested (0/3,776). As a proof-of-concept mitigation, a small architecture set is trained and the hardened expression with the lowest held-out RMSE is selected. On the jointly-run subset, this improves recovery from 34.4% for the only architecture present in all three configurations to 50.1%. On a Shockley diode target, the validation selector recovers cases missed by that baseline architecture, which by itself recovers 0/32 seeds. Since the jointly-run subset contains only three configurations, the selector result is evidence that validation-based architecture selection is promising, not a complete benchmark. These results support treating architecture as a measurable design variable that should be reported, stress-tested, and selected using held-out validation rather than fixed a priori.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2604.23256")
Code
Syntology Ran 7 of 7 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 7 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 7 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
7 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 7 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from ChakshuGupta13/lab. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
773f5598ff61e11b · report
72e542abd1787b52 · report
1b5077a9caacb414 · report
e5cd5dc94ca5532e · report
8df27feb27017962 · report
978eccfd807008ff · report
eecb027c96412c8a · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.23256, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections