Papers › FormalScience: Scalable Human-in-the-Loop Autoformalisation of Science with Agentic...
FormalScience: Scalable Human-in-the-Loop Autoformalisation of Science with Agentic Code Generation in Lean
Jordan Meadows, Lan Zhang, Andre Freitas
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Formalising informal mathematical reasoning into formally verifiable code is a significant challenge for large language models. In scientific fields such as physics, domain-specific machinery (\textit{e.g.} Dirac notation, vector calculus) imposes additional formalisation challenges that modern LLMs and agentic approaches have yet to tackle. To aid autoformalisation in scientific domains, we present FormalScience; a domain-agnostic human-in-the-loop agentic pipeline that enables a single domain expert (without deep formal language experience) to produce \textit{syntactically correct} and \textit{semantically aligned} formal proofs of informal reasoning for low economic cost. Applying FormalScience to physics, we construct FormalPhysics, a dataset of 200 university-level (LaTeX) physics problems and solutions (primarily quantum mechanics and electromagnetism), along with their Lean4 formal representations. Compared to existing formal math benchmarks, FormalPhysics achieves perfect formal validity and exhibits greater statement complexity. We evaluate open-source models and proprietary systems on a statement autoformalisation task on our dataset via zero-shot prompting, self-refinement with error feedback, and a novel multi-stage agentic approach, and explore autoformalisation limitations in modern LLM-based approaches. We provide the first systematic characterisation of semantic drift in physics autoformalisation in terms of concepts such as notational collapse and abstraction elevation which reveals what formal language verifies when full semantic preservation is unattainable. We release the codebase together with an interactive UI-based FormalScience system which facilitates autoformalisation and theorem proving in scientific domains beyond physics.https://github.com/jmeadows17/formal-science
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2604.23002")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 18 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 18 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
18 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 18 of the 18 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from jmeadows17/formal-science. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
3f591af4077d1334 · report
292fbce17179b3f1 · report
3b923c6ca15115d6 · report
bea63caee1e73b2f · report
e4a71e1814a2f956 · report
ff7e50034dfffbdd · report
d57caf45c8ba6356 · report
6899f148b5ea5f1f · report
b854f3824585eab7 · report
05bc7565ec711eb5 · report
ea8b2d7fb3799925 · report
f7546f4078fef874 · report
fd80353252a42ea7 · report
335d1ead6e46a569 · report
28ccff155d266348 · report
a2df4f81e844be6b · report
e575724a8eaebe1d · report
e47cd584f0ce0b55 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.23002, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections