Papers › JEPAMatch: Geometric Representation Shaping for Semi-Supervised Learning

JEPAMatch: Geometric Representation Shaping for Semi-Supervised Learning

22 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.21046added by Syntology

Ali Aghababaei-Harandi, Aude Sportisse, Massih-Reza Amini

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Semi-supervised learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for leveraging large amounts of unlabeled data to improve the performance of machine learning models when labeled data are scarce. Among existing approaches, methods derived from FixMatch have achieved state-of-the-art results in image classification by combining weak and strong data augmentations with confidence-based pseudo-labeling. Despite their strong empirical performance, these methods typically struggle with two critical bottlenecks: majority classes tend to dominate the learning process, which is amplified by incorrect pseudo-labels, leading to biased models. Furthermore, noisy early pseudo-labels prevent the model from forming clear decision boundaries, requiring prolonged training to learn informative representation. In this paper, we introduce a paradigm shift from conventional logical output threshold base, toward an explicit shaping of geometric representations. Our approach is inspired by the recently proposed Latent-Euclidean Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (LeJEPA), a theoretically grounded framework asserting that meaningful representations should exhibit an isotropic Gaussian structure in latent space. Building on this principle, we propose a new training objective that combines the classical semi-supervised loss used in FlexMatch, an adaptive extension of FixMatch, with a latent-space regularization term derived from LeJEPA. Our proposed approach, encourages well-structured representations while preserving the advantages of pseudo-labeling strategies. Through extensive experiments on CIFAR-100, STL-10 and Tiny-ImageNet, we demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing baselines. In addition, our method significantly accelerates the convergence, drastically reducing the overall computational cost compared to standard FixMatch-based pipelines.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from aah94/JEPAMatch. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.21046, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology

Syntology's extractor considered 2 leaderboards for this paper and placed the paper on none of them: 2 refused by a rule. What is not shown.

Syntology has checked 6,885 of the 9,623 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections