Papers › Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Generating Covalent Inhibitor Candidates

Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Generating Covalent Inhibitor Candidates

21 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.20019added by Syntology

Renee Gil

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Rational design of covalent inhibitors requires simultaneously optimizing multiple properties, such as binding affinity, target selectivity, or electrophilic reactivity. This presents a multi-objective problem not easily addressed by screening alone. Here we present a machine learning pipeline for generating covalent inhibitor candidates using multi-objective reinforcement learning (RL), applied to two targets: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and acetylcholinesterase (ACHE). A SMILES-based pretrained LSTM serves as the generative model, optimized via policy gradient RL with Pareto crowding distance to balance competing scoring functions including synthetic accessibility, predicted covalent activity, residue affinity, and an approximated docking score. The pipeline rediscovers known covalent inhibitors at rates of up to 0.50% (EGFR) and 0.74% (ACHE) in 10,000-structure runs, with candidate structures achieving warhead-to-residue distances as short as 5.5 angstrom (EGFR) and 3.2 angstrom (ACHE) after further docking-based screening. More notably, the pipeline spontaneously generates structures bearing warhead motifs absent from the training data - including allenes, 3-oxo-β-sultams, and α-methylene-β-lactones - all of which have independent literature support as covalent warheads. These results suggest that RL-guided generation can explore covalent chemical space beyond its training distribution, and may be useful as a tool for medicinal chemists working on covalent drug discovery.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from CDDLeiden/DrugEx. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.20019, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections