Papers › NCO4CVRP: Neural Combinatorial Optimization for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem

NCO4CVRP: Neural Combinatorial Optimization for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem

17 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.16581added by Syntology

Mahir Labib Dihan, Md. Ashrafur Rahman Khan, Wasif Jalal, Md. Roqunuzzaman Sojib, Mashroor Hasan Bhuiyan

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO) has emerged as a powerful framework for solving combinatorial optimization problems by integrating deep learning-based models. This work focuses on improving existing inference techniques to enhance solution quality and generalization. Specifically, we modify the Random Re-Construct (RRC) approach of the Light Encoder Heavy Decoder (LEHD) model by incorporating Simulated Annealing (SA). Unlike the conventional RRC, which greedily replaces suboptimal segments, our SA-based modification introduces a probabilistic acceptance mechanism that allows the model to escape local optima and explore a more diverse solution space. Additionally, we enhance the Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima (POMO) approach by integrating Beam Search, enabling systematic exploration of multiple promising solutions while maintaining diversity in the search space. We further investigate different inference strategies, including Softmax Sampling, Greedy, Gumbel-Softmax, and Epsilon-Greedy, analyzing their impact on solution quality. Furthermore, we explore instance augmentation techniques, such as horizontal and vertical flipping and rotation-based augmentations, to improve model generalization across different CVRP instances. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that these modifications significantly reduce the optimality gap across various Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) benchmarks, with Beam Search and SA-based RRC consistently yielding superior performance. By refining inference techniques and leveraging enhanced search strategies, our work contributes to the broader applicability of NCO models in real-world combinatorial optimization tasks.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 3 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 3 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.16581, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections