Papers › BASIS: Balanced Activation Sketching with Invariant Scalars for "Ghost Backpropagation"

BASIS: Balanced Activation Sketching with Invariant Scalars for "Ghost Backpropagation"

5 Mar 2026arXiv:2604.16324added by Syntology

Vladimer Khasia

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The activation memory required for exact backpropagation scales linearly with network depth, context length, and feature dimensionality, forming an O(L * BN ) spatial bottleneck (where B is the sequence-batch cardinality and N is the feature dimension). This constraint historically throttles the scaling of deep neural networks. While randomized automatic differentiation attempts to mitigate this, it historically suffers from catastrophic variance. In this paper, we introduce BASIS (Balanced Activation Sketching with Invariant Scalars), an efficient backpropagation algorithm that fully decouples activation memory from the batch and sequence dimensions. BASIS propagates the exact error signal (dX) to preserve flawless gradient flow, but computes the weight updates (dW) using massively compressed rank-R tensors. To solve the foundational instability of sketched gradients, we propose two novel mechanisms: Balanced Hashing, which strictly eliminates off-diagonal collision variance, and Invariant Scalars, a principled bias-variance tradeoff that deterministically preserves the exact continuous energy norm of the spatial geometry. Theoretically, BASIS reduces activation memory to O(L * RN ) and heavily decreases the backward pass matrix-multiplication footprint. Empirically, training a GPT architecture for 50,000 steps validates our theoretical guarantees: at R = 32, BASIS achieves parity with (and marginally outperforms) exact backpropagation validation loss (6.575 vs. 6.616), acting as an implicit regularizer. Remarkably, the stabilized magnitude trajectory allows the model to converge smoothly even under extreme spatial compression (R = 1), proving the extreme robustness of the estimator. The code is available at https://github.com/VladimerKhasia/basis

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2604.16324")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

VladimerKhasia/basis found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
2ran

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from VladimerKhasia/basis. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

MethodConfig VladimerKhasia/basis/basis.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 8b164778db66f1b2 · report
SketchedDense VladimerKhasia/basis/basis.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 097c170b96e4af15 · report
get_sketched_dot_primitive VladimerKhasia/basis/basis.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 996fe8f274794a09 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.16324, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections