Papers › NeuroLip: An Event-driven Spatiotemporal Learning Framework for Cross-Scene...
NeuroLip: An Event-driven Spatiotemporal Learning Framework for Cross-Scene Lip-Motion-based Visual Speaker Recognition
Junguang Yao, Wenye Liu, Stjepan Picek, Yue Zheng
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Visual speaker recognition based on lip motion offers a silent, hands-free, and behavior-driven biometric solution that remains effective even when acoustic cues are unavailable. Compared to traditional methods that rely heavily on appearance-dependent representations, lip motion encodes subject-specific behavioral dynamics driven by consistent articulation patterns and muscle coordination, offering inherent stability across environmental changes. However, capturing these robust, fine-grained dynamics is challenging for conventional frame-based cameras due to motion blur and low dynamic range. To exploit the intrinsic stability of lip motion and address these sensing limitations, we propose NeuroLip, an event-based framework that captures fine-grained lip dynamics under a strict yet practical cross-scene protocol: training is performed under a single controlled condition, while recognition must generalize to unseen viewing and lighting conditions. NeuroLip features a 1) Temporal-aware Voxel Encoding module with adaptive event weighting, 2) Structure-aware Spatial Enhancer that amplifies discriminative behavioral patterns by suppressing noise while preserving vertically structured motion information, and 3) Polarity Consistency Regularization mechanism to retain motion-direction cues encoded in event polarities. To facilitate systematic evaluation, we introduce DVSpeaker, a comprehensive event-based lip-motion dataset comprising 50 subjects recorded under four distinct viewpoint and illumination scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that NeuroLip achieves near-perfect matched-scene accuracy and robust cross-scene generalization, attaining over 71% accuracy on unseen viewpoints and nearly 76% under low-light conditions, outperforming representative existing methods by at least 8.54%. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/JiuZeongit/NeuroLip.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2604.15718")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 4 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
4 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from JiuZeongit/NeuroLip. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
872a789d8fc22c0f · report
b61eb4548efc662d · report
6d87749f69dce1a5 · report
6bca6a8087d203a3 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.15718, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections