Papers › An Analysis of Regularization and Fokker-Planck Residuals in Diffusion Models for...

An Analysis of Regularization and Fokker-Planck Residuals in Diffusion Models for Image Generation

16 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.15171added by Syntology

Onno Niemann, Gonzalo Martínez Muñoz, Alberto Suárez Gonzalez

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Recent work has shown that diffusion models trained with the denoising score matching (DSM) objective often violate the Fokker--Planck (FP) equation that governs the evolution of the true data density. Directly penalizing these deviations in the objective function reduces their magnitude but introduces a significant computational overhead. It is also observed that enforcing strict adherence to the FP equation does not necessarily lead to improvements in the quality of the generated samples, as often the best results are obtained with weaker FP regularization. In this paper, we investigate whether simpler penalty terms can provide similar benefits. We empirically analyze several lightweight regularizers, study their effect on FP residuals and generation quality, and show that the benefits of FP regularization are available at substantially lower computational cost. Our code is available at https://github.com/OnnoNiemann/fp_diffusion_analysis.

PaperPDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

OnnoNiemann/fp found in paper text by Syntologynot reachable when probed 2026-09-16 — repositories for recent papers often appear after camera-ready report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.15171, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections