Papers › ID and Graph View Contrastive Learning with Multi-View Attention Fusion for Sequential...

ID and Graph View Contrastive Learning with Multi-View Attention Fusion for Sequential Recommendation

15 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.14114added by Syntology

Xiaofan Zhou, Kyumin Lee

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Sequential recommendation has become increasingly prominent in both academia and industry, particularly in e-commerce. The primary goal is to extract user preferences from historical interaction sequences and predict items a user is likely to engage with next. Recent advances have leveraged contrastive learning and graph neural networks to learn more expressive representations from interaction histories -- graphs capture relational structure between nodes, while ID-based representations encode item-specific information. However, few studies have explored multi-view contrastive learning between ID and graph perspectives to jointly improve user and item representations, especially in settings where only interaction data is available without auxiliary information. To address this gap, we propose Multi-View Contrastive learning for sequential recommendation (MVCrec), a framework that integrates complementary signals from both sequential (ID-based) and graph-based views. MVCrec incorporates three contrastive objectives: within the sequential view, within the graph view, and across views. To effectively fuse the learned representations, we introduce a multi-view attention fusion module that combines global and local attention mechanisms to estimate the likelihood of a target user purchasing a target item. Comprehensive experiments on five real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that MVCrec consistently outperforms 11 state-of-the-art baselines, achieving improvements of up to 14.44\% in NDCG@10 and 9.22\% in HitRatio@10 over the strongest baseline. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/sword-Lz/MMCrec.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from sword-Lz/MMCrec. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.14114, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections