Papers › CASK: Core-Aware Selective KV Compression for Reasoning Traces

CASK: Core-Aware Selective KV Compression for Reasoning Traces

13 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.10900added by Syntology

Buseong Kim, Heejun Gwon

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

In large language models performing long-form reasoning, the KV cache grows rapidly with decode length, creating bottlenecks in memory and inference stability. Existing reasoning-oriented KV compression has mostly followed an eviction-centered view: estimate token importance more accurately, then discard lower-ranked entries. Our analysis suggests that scorer refinement alone often fails to substantially reorganize the actual keep-set and may therefore not be the main lever for preserving reasoning behavior. We instead frame reasoning KV compression as a behavior-preserving structured consolidation problem. CASK partitions the decode-time reasoning trace into a protected core that anchors answer formation and intermediate state, and mergeable scratch with high redundancy. The core is preserved, while selective consolidation is applied only to the scratch. To address prompt-heavy regimes where the prefix can exhaust the budget before decode-stage compression becomes active, CASK further uses a two-stage design: prefix eviction followed by decode-stage consolidation. On the H100 reasoning gate, CASK shows higher full-KV continuation fidelity than TriAttention at matched budgets on both AIME24 and AIME25, with recurring cask@384 > triattention@512 crossings. In prompt-heavy replay, multi_news and vcsum act as decode-active witnesses, while qmsum and gov_report expose the prefix_budget_exhausted boundary. The overall evidence supports a simple conclusion: effective reasoning KV compression depends less on more elaborate scorer engineering than on combining core preservation with selective scratch consolidation to lower the usable budget frontier.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

14 samples harvested; 5 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from THUDM/LongBench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.10900, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections