Papers › Tail-Aware Information-Theoretic Bounds for LLM Alignment under Heavy-Tailed Rewards

Tail-Aware Information-Theoretic Bounds for LLM Alignment under Heavy-Tailed Rewards

12 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.10727added by Syntology

Huiming Zhang, Binghan Li, Wan Tian, Qiang Sun

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Classical information-theoretic learning bounds typically rely on KL mutual information and moment-generating-function (MGF) arguments, which are well matched to bounded or sub-Gaussian losses but can be ineffective when losses or rewards are heavy-tailed. We develop a tail-aware information-theoretic framework for sub-Weibull data, where the tail parameter θ controls the tail heaviness: θ=2 corresponds to sub-Gaussian, θ=1 to sub-exponential, and 0<θ<1 to genuinely heavy tails. Our key technical ingredient is a decorrelation lemma that bounds change-of-measure expectations using a shifted-log f_θ-divergence, which admits explicit comparisons to Rényi divergence without MGF arguments. On the empirical-process side, we establish sharp maximal inequalities and a Dudley-type chaining bound for sub-Weibull processes, with logarithmic and entropy terms raised to the power 1/θ. These tools yield tail-adaptive selection bounds and a multiscale information-theoretic Dudley inequality based on shifted-log and Rényi mutual information. We apply our theory to large language models (LLMs) in the context of reward hacking within reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). We show that Rényi-regularized alignment provides finite reward guarantees and ensures that best-of-N policies remain well-controlled, thereby mitigating the catastrophic Goodhart effects where standard KL-regularization fails. We illustrate Rényi-regularized RLHF by experiments, including controlled heavy-tailed rewards and token-space reward attacks.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 2 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from NeXAIS/SubW-Alignment. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.10727, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections