Papers › QNAS: A Neural Architecture Search Framework for Accurate and Efficient Quantum Neural Networks

QNAS: A Neural Architecture Search Framework for Accurate and Efficient Quantum Neural Networks

8 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.07013added by Syntology

Kooshan Maleki, Alberto Marchisio, Muhammad Shafique

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Designing quantum neural networks (QNNs) that are both accurate and deployable on NISQ hardware is challenging. Handcrafted ansatze must balance expressivity, trainability, and resource use, while limited qubits often necessitate circuit cutting. Existing quantum architecture search methods primarily optimize accuracy while only heuristically controlling quantum and mostly ignore the exponential overhead of circuit cutting. We introduce QNAS, a neural architecture search framework that unifies hardware aware evaluation, multi objective optimization, and cutting overhead awareness for hybrid quantum classical neural networks (HQNNs). QNAS trains a shared parameter SuperCircuit and uses NSGA-II to optimize three objectives jointly: (i) validation error, (ii) a runtime cost proxy measuring wall clock evaluation time, and (iii) the estimated number of subcircuits under a target qubit budget. QNAS evaluates candidate HQNNs under a few epochs of training and discovers clear Pareto fronts that reveal tradeoffs between accuracy, efficiency, and cutting overhead. Across MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and Iris benchmarks, we observe that embedding type and CNOT mode selection significantly impact both accuracy and efficiency, with angle-y embedding and sparse entangling patterns outperforming other configurations on image datasets, and amplitude embedding excelling on tabular data (Iris). On MNIST, the best architecture achieves 97.16% test accuracy with a compact 8 qubit, 2 layer circuit; on the more challenging Fashion-MNIST, 87.38% with a 5 qubit, 2 layer circuit; and on Iris, 100% validation accuracy with a 4 qubit, 2 layer circuit. QNAS surfaces these design insights automatically during search, guiding practitioners toward architectures that balance accuracy, resource efficiency, and practical deployability on current hardware.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2604.07013")

Code

Syntology Ran 9 of 14 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 14 samples from 1 repository, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Kooshano/QNAS found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

14 samples harvested; 9 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

3ran · honoured contract
3ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it
2ran
5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Kooshano/QNAS. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

_env_get_float Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · honoured contract MIT (permissive) · 4d7f99ecf435626f · report
_env_get_int Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · honoured contract fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 8ed105a683397d95 · report
_env_get_list Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 8b2e84170d54110a · report
_filter_pairs_by_mode Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 1e81173eee59e2fe · report
_modes_str Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 2b070093dd3c9ba4 · report
_qlayer_to_wirecut_string Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 5239d69c259cc912 · report
_suppress_stderr Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · e3b66c62342c7405 · report
entangling_pairs Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · honoured contract fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 51df0556dc0786f6 · report
f3_num_subcircuits Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · 02d845633c31bd08 · report
QConfig Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · b598a79fa61e158b · report
QNNHyperProblem Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 4c71d22adf7448f4 · report
_get_gpu_id Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · cd49f32dc2bf68df · report
_get_worker_rank Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 81e16c4255db1028 · report
_next_eval_id Kooshano/QNAS/qnas/nsga2/problem.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · a9da2502a8a56511 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.07013, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections