Papers › Retrieve-then-Adapt: Retrieval-Augmented Test-Time Adaptation for Sequential Recommendation

Retrieve-then-Adapt: Retrieval-Augmented Test-Time Adaptation for Sequential Recommendation

7 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.05379added by Syntology

Xing Tang, Ziqiang Cui, Jingyang Bin, Xiaokun Zhang, Fuyuan Lyu, Jingyan Jiang, Dugang Liu, Chen Ma, Xiuqiang He

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The sequential recommendation (SR) task aims to predict the next item based on users' historical interaction sequences. Typically trained on historical data, SR models often struggle to adapt to real-time preference shifts during inference due to challenges posed by distributional divergence and parameterized constraints. Existing approaches to address this issue include test-time training, test-time augmentation, and retrieval-augmented fine-tuning. However, these methods either introduce significant computational overhead, rely on random augmentation strategies, or require a carefully designed two-stage training paradigm. In this paper, we argue that the key to effective test-time adaptation lies in achieving both effective augmentation and efficient adaptation. To this end, we propose Retrieve-then-Adapt (ReAd), a novel framework that dynamically adapts a deployed SR model to the test distribution through retrieved user preference signals. Specifically, given a trained SR model, ReAd first retrieves collaboratively similar items for a test user from a constructed collaborative memory database. A lightweight retrieval learning module then integrates these items into an informative augmentation embedding that captures both collaborative signals and prediction-refinement cues. Finally, the initial SR prediction is refined via a fusion mechanism that incorporates this embedding. Extensive experiments across five benchmark datasets demonstrate that ReAd consistently outperforms existing SR methods.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from xingt-tang/ReAd. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.05379, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections