Papers › Generative Modeling under Non-Monotone MAR Missingness via Approximate Wasserstein...

Generative Modeling under Non-Monotone MAR Missingness via Approximate Wasserstein Gradient Flows

6 Apr 2026arXiv:2604.04567added by Syntology

Gitte Kremling, Jeffrey Näf, Johannes Lederer

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The prevalence of missing values in data science poses a substantial risk to any further analyses. Despite a wealth of research, principled nonparametric methods to deal with general non-monotone missingness are still scarce. Instead, ad-hoc imputation methods are often used, for which it remains unclear whether the correct distribution can be recovered. In this paper, we propose FLOWGEM, a principled iterative method for generating a complete dataset from a dataset with values Missing at Random (MAR). Motivated by convergence results of the ignoring maximum likelihood estimator, our approach minimizes the expected Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the observed data distribution and the distribution of the generated sample over different missingness patterns. To minimize the KL divergence, we employ a discretized particle evolution of the corresponding Wasserstein Gradient Flow, where the velocity field is approximated using a local linear estimator of the density ratio. This construction yields a data generation scheme that iteratively transports an initial particle ensemble toward the target distribution. Simulation studies and real-data benchmarks demonstrate that FLOWGEM achieves state-of-the-art performance across a range of settings, including the challenging case of non-monotone MAR mechanisms. Together, these results position FLOWGEM as a principled and practical alternative to existing imputation methods, and a decisive step towards closing the gap between theoretical rigor and empirical performance.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2604.04567, was issued in April 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections