Papers › Globalized Adversarial Regret Optimization: Robust Decisions with Uncalibrated Predictions

Globalized Adversarial Regret Optimization: Robust Decisions with Uncalibrated Predictions

26 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.25948added by Syntology

Jannis Kurtz, Bart P. G. van Parys

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Optimization problems routinely depend on uncertain parameters that must be predicted before a decision is made. Classical robust and regret formulations are designed to handle erroneous predictions and can provide statistical error bounds in simple settings. However, when predictions lack rigorous error bounds (as is typical of modern machine learning methods) classical robust models often yield vacuous guarantees, while regret formulations can paradoxically produce decisions that are more optimistic than even a nominal solution. We introduce Globalized Adversarial Regret Optimization (GARO), a decision framework that controls adversarial regret, defined as the gap between the worst-case cost and the oracle robust cost, uniformly across all possible uncertainty set sizes. By design, GARO delivers absolute or relative performance guarantees against an oracle with full knowledge of the prediction error, without requiring any probabilistic calibration of the uncertainty set. We show that GARO equipped with a relative rate function generalizes the classical adaptation method of Lepski to downstream decision problems. We derive exact tractable reformulations for problems with affine worst-case cost functions and polyhedral norm uncertainty sets, and provide a discretization and a constraint-generation algorithm with convergence guarantees for general settings. Finally, experiments demonstrate that GARO yields solutions with a more favorable trade-off between worst-case and mean out-of-sample performance, as well as stronger global performance guarantees.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from JannisKu/GARO. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.25948, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections