Papers › Grounding Arabic LLMs in the Doha Historical Dictionary: Retrieval-Augmented...

Grounding Arabic LLMs in the Doha Historical Dictionary: Retrieval-Augmented Understanding of Quran and Hadith

25 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.23972added by Syntology

Somaya Eltanbouly, Samer Rashwani

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in many language tasks, yet they continue to struggle with complex historical and religious Arabic texts such as the Quran and Hadith. To address this limitation, we develop a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework grounded in diachronic lexicographic knowledge. Unlike prior RAG systems that rely on general-purpose corpora, our approach retrieves evidence from the Doha Historical Dictionary of Arabic (DHDA), a large-scale resource documenting the historical development of Arabic vocabulary. The proposed pipeline combines hybrid retrieval with an intent-based routing mechanism to provide LLMs with precise, contextually relevant historical information. Our experiments show that this approach improves the accuracy of Arabic-native LLMs, including Fanar and ALLaM, to over 85\%, substantially reducing the performance gap with Gemini, a proprietary large-scale model. Gemini also serves as an LLM-as-a-judge system for automatic evaluation in our experiments. The automated judgments were verified through human evaluation, demonstrating high agreement (kappa = 0.87). An error analysis further highlights key linguistic challenges, including diacritics and compound expressions. These findings demonstrate the value of integrating diachronic lexicographic resources into retrieval-augmented generation frameworks to enhance Arabic language understanding, particularly for historical and religious texts. The code and resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/somayaeltanbouly/Doha-Dictionary-RAG.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 11 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from somayaeltanbouly/Doha-Dictionary-RAG. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.23972, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections