Papers › Non-Adversarial Imitation Learning Provably Free of Compounding Errors: The Value Flow...
Non-Adversarial Imitation Learning Provably Free of Compounding Errors: The Value Flow Mechanism
Tian Xu, Chenyang Wang, Xiaochen Zhai, Ziniu Li, Yi-Chen Li, Yang Yu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Adversarial imitation learning (AIL) achieves high-quality imitation by mitigating compounding errors inherent to behavioral cloning (BC), yet its adversarial optimization frequently leads to training instability. A class of non-adversarial Q-based imitation learning (IL) methods, exemplified by IQ-Learn, has emerged to address this instability and is widely believed to outperform BC by leveraging online environment interactions. In this paper, we revisit IQ-Learn and prove that it in fact reduces to BC: it admits an imitation gap lower bound with quadratic dependence on the horizon and therefore remains susceptible to compounding errors. Our theoretical analysis reveals why online interactions fail to help: IQ-Learn uniformly suppresses Q-values for all actions at states not covered by demonstrations, preventing generalization beyond demonstrations. To address this fundamental limitation, we introduce Dual Q-DM, a new Q-based IL method built on Bellman constraints. Crucially, Bellman constraints drive value flow: Q-values propagate from demonstrated to unvisited states through environment dynamics, enabling generalization beyond demonstrations. We prove that Dual Q-DM is equivalent to AIL and can recover expert actions at unvisited states, thereby mitigating compounding errors. To the best of our knowledge, Dual Q-DM is the first non-adversarial IL method that is theoretically guaranteed to eliminate compounding errors. Experimental results further corroborate our theoretical findings.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.22713")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from LAMDA-RL/Dual-Q-DM. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
a4f53a161a5f74e7 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.22713, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections