Papers › Joint Surrogate Learning of Objectives, Constraints, and Sensitivities for Efficient...

Joint Surrogate Learning of Objectives, Constraints, and Sensitivities for Efficient Multi-objective Optimization of Neural Dynamical Systems

22 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.20984added by Syntology

Frithjof Gressmann, Ivan Georgiev Raikov, Seung Hyun Kim, Mattia Gazzola, Lawrence Rauchwerger, Ivan Soltesz

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Biophysical neural system simulations are among the most computationally demanding scientific applications, and their optimization requires navigating high-dimensional parameter spaces under numerous constraints that impose a binary feasible/infeasible partition with no gradient signal to guide the search. Here, we introduce DMOSOPT, a scalable optimization framework that leverages a unified, jointly learned surrogate model to capture the interplay between objectives, constraints, and parameter sensitivities. By learning a smooth approximation of both the objective landscape and the feasibility boundary, the joint surrogate provides a unified gradient that simultaneously steers the search toward improved objective values and greater constraint satisfaction, while its partial derivatives yield per-parameter sensitivity estimates that enable more targeted exploration. We validate the framework from single-cell dynamics to population-level network activity, spanning incremental stages of a neural circuit modeling workflow, and demonstrate efficient, effective optimization of highly constrained problems at supercomputing scale with substantially fewer problem evaluations. While motivated by and demonstrated in the context of computational neuroscience, the framework is general and applicable to constrained multi-objective optimization problems across scientific and engineering domains.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

12 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 12 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from GazzolaLab/MultiObjectiveSurrogateOptimization. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.20984, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections