Papers › RECLAIM: Cyclic Causal Discovery Amid Measurement Noise
RECLAIM: Cyclic Causal Discovery Amid Measurement Noise
Muralikrishnna G. Sethuraman, Faramarz Fekri
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Uncovering causal relationships is a fundamental problem across science and engineering. However, most existing causal discovery methods assume acyclicity and direct access to the system variables -- assumptions that fail to hold in many real-world settings. For instance, in genomics, cyclic regulatory networks are common, and measurements are often corrupted by instrumental noise. To address these challenges, we propose RECLAIM, a causal discovery framework that natively handles both cycles and measurement noise. RECLAIM learns the causal graph structure by maximizing the likelihood of the observed measurements via expectation-maximization (EM), using residual normalizing flows for tractable likelihood computation. We consider two measurement models: (i) Gaussian additive noise, and (ii) a linear measurement system with additive Gaussian noise. We provide theoretical consistency guarantees for both the settings. Experiments on synthetic data and real-world protein signaling datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.20585")
Code
Syntology Ran 13 of 16 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 6 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 14 samples from 2 repositories, 11 ran; 2 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
16 samples harvested; 13 ran; 4 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 7 of the 16 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
b247cadebbfe6ae9 · report
69d3afa611d63e4a · report
72e6314eade786b6 · report
758e5a8287d53a49 · report
7675512fb9bc454d · report
80e7ad0073cbe44a · report
cdc75404d5b0feda · report
7111229dac5d075d · report
ea598b7c82d3eed6 · report
9eb6e1ad48e2512a · report
f86d1cafe6184373 · report
5cd6b72b950a8f61 · report
b33a34848bc8c316 · report
fcb90704ee341c2c · report
d6775d96f6872aa7 · report
717be1181092e347 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.20585, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections