Papers › The Deep-Match Framework for Event-Related Potential Detection in EEG
The Deep-Match Framework for Event-Related Potential Detection in EEG
Marek Zylinski, Bartosz Tomasz Smigielski, Gerard Cybulski
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Reliable detection of event-related potentials (ERPs) at the single-trial level remains a major challenge due to the low signal-to-noise ratio EEG recordings. In this work, we investigate whether incorporating prior knowledge about ERP templates into deep learning models can improve detection performance. We employ the Deep-Match framework for ERP detection using multi-channel EEG signals. The model is trained in two stages. First, an encoder-decoder architecture is trained to reconstruct input EEG signals, enabling the network to learn compact signal representations. In the second stage, the decoder is replaced with a detection module, and the network is fine-tuned for ERP identification. Two model variants are evaluated: a standard model with randomly initialized filters and a Deep-MF model in which input kernels are initialized using ERP templates. Model performance is assessed on a single-trial ERP detection task using leave-one-subject-out validation. The proposed Deep-MF model slightly outperforms the detector with standard kernel initialization for most held-out subjects. Despite substantial inter-subject variability, Deep-MF achieves a higher average F1-score (0.37) compared to the standard network (0.34), indicating improved robustness to cross-subject differences. The best performance obtained by Deep-MF reaches an F1-score of 0.71, exceeding the maximum score achieved by the standard model (0.59). These results demonstrate that ERP-informed kernel initialization can provide consistent improvements in subject-independent single-trial ERP detection. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of integrating domain knowledge with deep learning architectures for EEG analysis. The proposed approach represents a step toward practical wearable EEG and passive brain-computer interface systems capable of real-time monitoring of cognitive processes.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.20258")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 1 sample are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Marower/DeepMF_ERP_Detection_in_EEG-main. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0f25d1c918c58ade · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.20258, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections