Papers › Learn for Variation: Efficient AAV Trajectory Learning through a Differentiable...
Learn for Variation: Efficient AAV Trajectory Learning through a Differentiable Wireless World Model
Xiucheng Wang, Zhenye Chen, Nan Cheng, Zhisheng Yin, Xuemin Shen
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Autonomous aerial vehicles (AAVs) enable data collection for sixth-generation Internet-of-Things networks, but their trajectories couple nonlinear wireless rates with long-horizon service progress. This paper views the evolution of AAV kinematics, channel state, and user backlog as a structured differentiable world model and develops Learn for Variation (L4V) to exploit that model efficiently. L4V replaces a discontinuous completion-time objective with a cumulative-backlog surrogate, unrolls the mission dynamics, and propagates pathwise sensitivities to a neural policy through the discrete adjoint recursion. The resulting derivative is exact conditional on a fixed exogenous-noise realization; stochastic expected-objective optimization still requires sampling. We show that the structured adjoint grows at most polynomially with the horizon and establish a stationary-point rate for fixed-step full-gradient descent under standard smoothness assumptions. The framework also learns shared OFDMA allocation under reparameterized shadowing and Rician fading, while distributional pretraining amortizes model-based optimization into forward-only deployment on unseen layouts. Paired stress tests cover channel-generator mismatch, noisy partial observations, a fixed-resource two-AAV extension, and a circular no-fly region. Code and configurations are available at https://github.com/UNIC-Lab/L4V-AAV. Against genetic-algorithm, DQN, A2C, DDPG, and differentiable model-predictive-control implementations, L4V reduces mission time by up to 65%, executes a default mission in 53 ms, and completes all 60 frozen-policy tests after pretraining on 1,600 layouts.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.18853")
Code
Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from UNIC-Lab/L4V-AAV. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
761b81fd9ecb828e · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.18853, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections