Papers › Flow Matching Policy Optimization with Mirror Descent and Entropy Constraints

Flow Matching Policy Optimization with Mirror Descent and Entropy Constraints

18 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.17685added by Syntology

Ting Gao, Stavros Orfanoudakis, Nan Lin, Winnie Daamen, Serge Hoogendoorn, Elvin Isufi

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Balancing policy expressiveness with the exploration-exploitation trade-off is a core challenge in online Reinforcement Learning (RL). While Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE)-based diffusion policies can represent complex, multimodal action distributions, they suffer from two critical limitations: their stochastic reverse processes render entropy intractable (necessitating heuristic exploration), and computing policy gradients through long denoising chains is expensive and unstable. In this work, we show that ODE-based flow matching inherently resolves these issues by enabling both simulation-free policy optimization and tractable entropy computation. Building on this, we introduce Flow Matching Policy Optimization with Mirror Descent and Entropy Constraints (FMER). Our framework exploits this insight in three ways. First, we theoretically establish that minimizing an advantage-weighted conditional flow matching loss acts as a simulation-free surrogate for policy mirror descent. This steers the velocity field toward high-value regions while entirely avoiding backpropagation through the ODE solver. Second, we derive an analytic entropy objective that corrects for the density distortion caused by the tanh transformation (mapping an unbounded latent space to bounded actions), thereby facilitating principled maximum-entropy optimization. Finally, we dynamically tune the mirror descent temperature based on the effective sample size to enforce a robust trust region during training. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that FMER achieves superior performance on the challenging sparse-reward FrankaKitchen environment, while maintaining competitive results across standard dense-reward MuJoCo benchmarks.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

29 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 21 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 18 of the 29 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.17685, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections