</> Code with Papers by Syntology

Papers › Open-Source Reproduction and Explainability Analysis of Corrective Retrieval Augmented...

Open-Source Reproduction and Explainability Analysis of Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation

17 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.16169added by Syntology

Surya Vardhan Yalavarthi

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) improves the robustness of RAG systems by evaluating retrieved document quality and triggering corrective actions. However, the original implementation relies on proprietary components including the Google Search API and closed model weights, limiting reproducibility. In this work, we present a fully open-source reproduction of CRAG, replacing proprietary web search with the Wikipedia API and the original LLaMA-2 generator with Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct. We evaluate on PopQA and ARC-Challenge, demonstrating that our open-source pipeline achieves comparable performance to the original system. Furthermore, we contribute the first explainability analysis of CRAG's T5-based retrieval evaluator using SHAP, revealing that the evaluator primarily relies on named entity alignment rather than semantic similarity. Our analysis identifies key failure modes including domain transfer limitations on science questions. All code and results are available at https://github.com/suryayalavarthi/crag-reproduction.

PaperPDF

Code

suryayalavarthi/crag-reproduction found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.16169, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections