</> Code with Papers by Syntology

Papers › Evaluating Causal Discovery Algorithms for Path-Specific Fairness and Utility in Healthcare

Evaluating Causal Discovery Algorithms for Path-Specific Fairness and Utility in Healthcare

16 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.15926added by Syntology

Nitish Nagesh, Elahe Khatibi, Thomas Hughes, Mahdi Bagheri, Pratik Gajane, Amir M. Rahmani

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Causal discovery in health data faces evaluation challenges when ground truth is unknown. We address this by collaborating with experts to construct proxy ground-truth graphs, establishing benchmarks for synthetic Alzheimer's disease and heart failure clinical records data. We evaluate the Peter-Clark, Greedy Equivalence Search, and Fast Causal Inference algorithms on structural recovery and path-specific fairness decomposition, going beyond composite fairness scores. On synthetic data, Peter-Clark achieved the best structural recovery. On heart failure data, Fast Causal Inference achieved the highest utility. For path-specific effects, ejection fraction contributed 3.37 percentage points to the indirect effect in the ground truth. These differences drove variations in the fairness-utility ratio across algorithms. Our results highlight the need for graph-aware fairness evaluation and fine-grained path-specific analysis when deploying causal discovery in clinical applications.

PaperPDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

nitish-nagesh/causal-discovery-fairness found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.15926, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections