Papers › Evidential Domain Adaptation for Remaining Useful Life Prediction with Incomplete Degradation

Evidential Domain Adaptation for Remaining Useful Life Prediction with Incomplete Degradation

15 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.15687added by Syntology

Yubo Hou, Mohamed Ragab, Yucheng Wang, Min Wu, Abdulla Alseiari, Chee-Keong Kwoh, Xiaoli Li, Zhenghua Chen

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction without labeled target domain data is a critical challenge, and domain adaptation (DA) has been widely adopted to address it by transferring knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain. Despite its success, existing DA methods struggle significantly when faced with incomplete degradation trajectories in the target domain, particularly due to the absence of late degradation stages. This missing data introduces a key extrapolation challenge. When applied to such incomplete RUL prediction tasks, current DA methods encounter two primary limitations. First, most DA approaches primarily focus on global alignment, which can misaligns late degradation stage in the source domain with early degradation stage in the target domain. Second, due to varying operating conditions in RUL prediction, degradation patterns may differ even within the same degradation stage, resulting in different learned features. As a result, even if degradation stages are partially aligned, simple feature matching cannot fully align two domains. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel evidential adaptation approach called EviAdapt, which leverages evidential learning to enhance domain adaptation. The method first segments the source and target domain data into distinct degradation stages based on degradation rate, enabling stage-wise alignment that ensures samples from corresponding stages are accurately matched. To address the second limitation, we introduce an evidential uncertainty alignment technique that estimates uncertainty using evidential learning and aligns the uncertainty across matched stages.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 2 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from keyplay/EviAdapt. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.15687, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections