Papers › Token Coherence: Adapting MESI Cache Protocols to Minimize Synchronization Overhead in...

Token Coherence: Adapting MESI Cache Protocols to Minimize Synchronization Overhead in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

16 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.15183added by Syntology

Vladyslav Parakhin

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Multi-agent LLM orchestration incurs synchronization costs scaling as O(n x S x |D|) in agents, steps, and artifact size under naive broadcast -- a regime I term broadcast-induced triply-multiplicative overhead. I argue this pathology is a structural residue of full-state rebroadcast, not an inherent property of multi-agent coordination. The central claim: synchronization cost explosion in LLM multi-agent systems maps with formal precision onto the cache coherence problem in shared-memory multiprocessors, and MESI-protocol invalidation transfers to artifact synchronization under minimal structural modification. I construct the Artifact Coherence System (ACS) and prove the Token Coherence Theorem: lazy invalidation attenuates cost by at least S/(n + W(d_i)) when S > n + W(d_i), converting O(n x S x |D|) to O((n + W) x |D|). A TLA+-verified protocol enforces single-writer safety, monotonic versioning, and bounded staleness across ~2,400 explored states. Simulation across four workload configurations yields token savings of 95.0% +/- 1.3% at V=0.05, 92.3% +/- 1.4% at V=0.10, 88.3% +/- 1.5% at V=0.25, and 84.2% +/- 1.3% at V=0.50 -- each exceeding the theorem's conservative lower bounds. Savings of ~81% persist at V=0.9, contrary to the predicted collapse threshold. Contributions: (1) formal MESI-to-artifact state mapping; (2) Token Coherence Theorem as savings lower bound; (3) TLA+-verified protocol with three proven invariants; (4) characterization of conditional artifact access semantics resolving the always-read objection; (5) reference Python implementation integrating with LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen via thin adapter layers.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from hipvlady/agent-coherence. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.15183, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections