Papers › MER-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Meme Reappraisal

MER-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Meme Reappraisal

16 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.15020added by Syntology

Yiqi Nie, Fei Wang, Junjie Chen, Kun Li, Yudi Cai, Dan Guo, Chenglong Li, Meng Wang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Memes represent a tightly coupled, multimodal form of social expression, in which visual context and overlaid text jointly convey nuanced affect and commentary. Inspired by cognitive reappraisal in psychology, we introduce Meme Reappraisal, a novel multimodal generation task that aims to transform negatively framed memes into constructive ones while preserving their underlying scenario, entities, and structural layout. Unlike prior works on meme understanding or generation, Meme Reappraisal requires emotion-controllable, structure-preserving multimodal transformation under multiple semantic and stylistic constraints. To support this task, we construct MER-Bench, a benchmark of real-world memes with fine-grained multimodal annotations, including source and target emotions, positively rewritten meme text, visual editing specifications, and taxonomy labels covering visual type, sentiment polarity, and layout structure. We further propose a structured evaluation framework based on a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-as-a-Judge paradigm, decomposing performance into modality-level generation quality, affect controllability, structural fidelity, and global affective alignment. Extensive experiments across representative image-editing and multimodal-generation systems reveal substantial gaps in satisfying the constraints of structural preservation, semantic consistency, and affective transformation. We believe MER-Bench establishes a foundation for research on controllable meme editing and emotion-aware multimodal generation. Our code is available at: https://github.com/one-seven17/MER-Bench.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from one-seven17/MER-Bench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.15020, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections