Papers › Learning Transferable Sensor Models via Language-Informed Pretraining
Learning Transferable Sensor Models via Language-Informed Pretraining
Yuliang Chen, Arvind Pillai, Yu Yvonne Wu, Tess Z. Griffin, Lisa Marsch, Michael V. Heinz, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Andrew Campbell
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Modern sensing systems generate large volumes of unlabeled multivariate time-series data. This abundance of unlabeled data makes self-supervised learning (SSL) a natural approach for learning transferable representations. However, most existing approaches are optimized for reconstruction or forecasting objectives and often fail to capture the semantic structure required for downstream classification and reasoning tasks. While recent sensor-language alignment methods improve semantic generalization through captioning and zero-shot transfer, they are limited to fixed sensor configurations, such as predefined channel sets, signal lengths, or temporal resolutions, which hinders cross-domain applicability. To address these gaps, we introduce \textbf{SLIP} (\textbf{S}ensor \textbf{L}anguage-\textbf{I}nformed \textbf{P}retraining), an open-source framework for learning language-aligned representations that generalize across diverse sensor setups. SLIP integrates contrastive alignment with sensor-conditioned captioning, facilitating both discriminative understanding and generative reasoning. By repurposing a pretrained decoder-only language model via cross-attention and introducing an elegant, flexible patch-embedder, SLIP supports different temporal resolutions and variable-length input at inference time without additional retraining. Across 11 datasets, SLIP demonstrates superior performance in zero-shot transfer, signal captioning, and question answering. It achieves a 77.14% average linear-probing accuracy, a 5.93% relative improvement over strong baselines, and reaches 64.83% accuracy in sensor-based question answering.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.11950")
Code
Syntology Ran 14 of 24 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 10 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 11 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 24 samples from 1 repository, 14 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
24 samples harvested; 14 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 10 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 24 of the 24 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from yuc0805/SLIP. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
a1f4664f7d4cbd00 · report
bda46ca17458b649 · report
d936fd21ebf8cc5b · report
a98fd875f2dbc00a · report
5d4c1b7693e430ac · report
33835471adf9cc75 · report
eb3e21fdc8b60815 · report
3be8a11f65d2e093 · report
9e771963d3668d07 · report
9a3912a4a8116c52 · report
c2185f8fe9d5ccd7 · report
a9dc290bb539fe5a · report
ee333e8deeec6f6d · report
103e0ae78432d277 · report
3d40f2aab5c60be5 · report
e01d589f87b10a27 · report
2cb111ecfc6c0ff4 · report
e8608156e8c60386 · report
ed742453c07974e2 · report
b299100e380798a3 · report
b84b10ddee4308ca · report
feab1759ab5753c7 · report
6ab251ef16ca3891 · report
94387b4e748f7f0b · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.11950, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections