Papers › OpenClaw-RL: Train Any Agent Simply by Talking

OpenClaw-RL: Train Any Agent Simply by Talking

10 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.10165added by Syntology

Yinjie Wang, Xuyang Chen, Xiaolong Jin, Mengdi Wang, Ling Yang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Every agent interaction generates a next-state signal, namely the user reply, tool output, terminal or GUI state change that follows each action, yet no existing agentic RL system recovers it as a live, online learning source. We present OpenClaw-RL, a framework that employs next-state signals to optimize personal agents online through infrastructure and methodology innovations. On the infrastructure side, we extend existing RL systems to a server-client architecture where the RL server hosts the policy behind an inference API and user terminals stream interaction data back over HTTP. From each observed next state, the system extracts two complementary training signals, evaluative and directive, via a separate asynchronous server so that neither signal extraction nor optimization blocks inference. On the methodology side, we introduce a hybrid RL objective that unifies both signal types in a single update: directive signals provide richer, token-level supervision but are sparser, while evaluative signals are more broadly available. To stabilize distillation under teacher-student mismatch, we propose overlap-guided hint selection, which picks the hint whose induced teacher distribution maximally overlaps with the student's top-k tokens, together with a log-probability-difference clip that bounds per-token advantages. Applied to personal agents, OpenClaw-RL enables an agent to improve simply by being used, recovering conversational signals from user re-queries, corrections, and explicit feedback. Applied to general agents, OpenClaw-RL is the first RL framework to unify real-world agent settings spanning terminal, GUI, SWE, and tool-call environments, where we additionally demonstrate the utility of next-state signals in long-horizon settings.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Gen-Verse/OpenClaw-RL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.10165, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections