Papers › High-Fidelity Pruning for Large Language Models

High-Fidelity Pruning for Large Language Models

9 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.08083added by Syntology

Yijun Zhu, Jianxin Wang, Chengchao Shen

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of tasks, yet their significant computational and memory requirements present major challenges for deployment. A common approach uses Taylor expansion on the loss function to estimate neuron importance. However, its reliance on one-hot cross entropy loss, a key limitation is that it narrowly assesses importance based only on the probability assigned to the single predicted next token, thereby ignoring the other potential predictions of the original model. An intuitive solution to address this is to employ self distillation criterion for importance evaluation. However, this approach introduces significant computational overhead by requiring a separate teacher model for supervision. To this end, we propose a simple but effective criterion, information entropy of the model's output distribution, to efficiently evaluate importance scores of neurons with Taylor pruning without requirement of additional teacher. Compared to plain cross entropy criterion, it provides a more holistic criterion for Taylor pruning to prune neurons with the least impact on the prediction of model in a global manner, thereby preserving the fidelity of the model's predictive capabilities. Experimental results on extensive zero-shot benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing pruning methods across the LLaMA and Qwen series models. The source code and trained weights are availabel at https://github.com/visresearch/HFPrune.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from visresearch/HFPrune. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.08083, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections