Papers › Emotion Transcription in Conversation: A Benchmark for Capturing Subtle and Complex...
Emotion Transcription in Conversation: A Benchmark for Capturing Subtle and Complex Emotional States through Natural Language
Yoshiki Tanaka, Ryuichi Uehara, Koji Inoue, Michimasa Inaba
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Emotion Recognition in Conversation (ERC) is critical for enabling natural human-machine interactions. However, existing methods predominantly employ categorical or dimensional emotion annotations, which often fail to adequately represent complex, subtle, or culturally specific emotional nuances. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel task named Emotion Transcription in Conversation (ETC). This task focuses on generating natural language descriptions that accurately reflect speakers' emotional states within conversational contexts. To address the ETC, we constructed a Japanese dataset comprising text-based dialogues annotated with participants' self-reported emotional states, described in natural language. The dataset also includes emotion category labels for each transcription, enabling quantitative analysis and its application to ERC. We benchmarked baseline models, finding that while fine-tuning on our dataset enhances model performance, current models still struggle to infer implicit emotional states. The ETC task will encourage further research into more expressive emotion understanding in dialogue. The dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/UEC-InabaLab/ETCDataset.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.07138, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections