Papers › Exact Is Easier: Credit Assignment for Cooperative LLM Agents

Exact Is Easier: Credit Assignment for Cooperative LLM Agents

6 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.06859added by Syntology

Yanjun Chen, Yirong Sun, Hanlin Wang, Jinghan Wang, Xinming Zhang, Xiaoyu Shen, Wenjie Li, Wei Zhang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Removing an agent from a cooperative team to measure its contribution seems natural, yet in multi-agent LLM systems this evaluation distorts the result it claims to measure. This failure is not isolated: learned critics, trajectory-level baselines, and agent-removal counterfactuals all inherit from standard multi-agent reinforcement learning a premise that exact counterfactual evaluation requires privileged environment access, and therefore approximate. In cooperative LLM systems, this premise is false. Interaction histories are deterministic functions of observable text with no hidden state, so any decision point can be restored exactly, making direct causal measurement possible without parametric approximation. C3 exploits this property by fixing the complete history at each decision point, sampling alternative actions under a frozen behavior policy, and computing unbiased per-decision advantages through a parameter-free leave-one-out baseline. Across six benchmarks spanning math reasoning and code generation, two model families, and two multi-agent topologies, C3 consistently outperforms all baselines; a controlled decomposition confirms gains originate from credit quality, not architecture, while checkpoint restoration reduces training token consumption. The exact solution proves simpler, cheaper, and more effective than all approximate alternatives. The same structural property that enables exact credit also enables exact verification: three independently computable diagnostics, credit fidelity, within-group variance, and inter-agent influence, constitute the first method-agnostic auditing tool for multi-agent LLM credit assignment. Our code is available at https://github.com/EIT-EAST-Lab/C3

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from EIT-EAST-Lab/C3. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.06859, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections