Papers › SmartBench: Evaluating LLMs in Smart Homes with Anomalous Device States and Behavioral Contexts

SmartBench: Evaluating LLMs in Smart Homes with Anomalous Device States and Behavioral Contexts

24 Feb 2026arXiv:2603.06636added by Syntology

Qingsong Zou, Zhi Yan, Zhiyao Xu, Kuofeng Gao, Jingyu Xiao, Yong Jiang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Due to the strong context-awareness capabilities demonstrated by large language models (LLMs), recent research has begun exploring their integration into smart home assistants to help users manage and adjust their living environments. While LLMs have been shown to effectively understand user needs and provide appropriate responses, most existing studies primarily focus on interpreting and executing user behaviors or instructions. However, a critical function of smart home assistants is the ability to detect when the home environment is in an anomalous state. This involves two key requirements: the LLM must accurately determine whether an anomalous condition is present, and provide either a clear explanation or actionable suggestions. To enhance the anomaly detection capabilities of next-generation LLM-based smart home assistants, we introduce SmartBench, which is the first smart home dataset designed for LLMs, containing both normal and anomalous device states as well as normal and anomalous device state transition contexts. We evaluate 13 mainstream LLMs on this benchmark. The experimental results show that most state-of-the-art models cannot achieve good anomaly detection performance. For example, Claude-Sonnet-4.5 achieves only 66.1% detection accuracy on context-independent anomaly categories, and performs even worse on context-dependent anomalies, with an accuracy of only 57.8%. More experimental results suggest that next-generation LLM-based smart home assistants are still far from being able to effectively detect and handle anomalous conditions in the smart home environment. Our dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/horizonsinzqs/SmartBench.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.06636")

Code

Syntology Ran 8 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 8 samples from 1 repository, 8 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

horizonsinzqs/SmartBench found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5ran · our draft was wrong
3ran

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from horizonsinzqs/SmartBench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

_walk_samples horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · e074228f42036d31 · report
build_public_views horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · e65e775464399e47 · report
load_argus horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · cf8c28b2c3471bf9 · report
load_context_independent horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 206dda03d87eb3a3 · report
load_json horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · f10deba8c8561bee · report
load_tdcs horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · 2fe0c2560b5e650d · report
sample_id horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 6b59f009c0388bc0 · report
write_json horizonsinzqs/SmartBench/experiments/common/public_benchmark.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 8002a68400850f80 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.06636, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections