Papers › 3D CBCT Artefact Removal Using Perpendicular Score-Based Diffusion Models

3D CBCT Artefact Removal Using Perpendicular Score-Based Diffusion Models

6 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.06300added by Syntology

Susanne Schaub, Florentin Bieder, Matheus L. Oliveira, Yulan Wang, Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt, Michael M. Bornstein, Philippe C. Cattin

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a widely used 3D imaging technique in dentistry, offering high-resolution images while minimising radiation exposure for patients. However, CBCT is highly susceptible to artefacts arising from high-density objects such as dental implants, which can compromise image quality and diagnostic accuracy. To reduce artefacts, implant inpainting in the sequence of projections plays a crucial role in many artefact reduction approaches. Recently, diffusion models have achieved state-of-the-art results in image generation and have widely been applied to image inpainting tasks. However, to our knowledge, existing diffusion-based methods for implant inpainting operate on independent 2D projections. This approach neglects the correlations among individual projections, resulting in inconsistencies in the reconstructed images. To address this, we propose a 3D dental implant inpainting approach based on perpendicular score-based diffusion models, each trained in two different planes and operating in the projection domain. The 3D distribution of the projection series is modelled by combining the two 2D score-based diffusion models in the sampling scheme. Our results demonstrate the method's effectiveness in producing high-quality, artefact-reduced 3D CBCT images, making it a promising solution for improving clinical imaging.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from SusanneSchaub/TPDM_Implant_Inpainting. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.06300, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections