Papers › Self-Auditing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Few-Shot 3D Medical Image Segmentation

Self-Auditing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Few-Shot 3D Medical Image Segmentation

6 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.05822added by Syntology

Son Thai Ly, Hien V. Nguyen

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Adapting foundation models to new clinical sites remains challenging in practice. Domain shift and scarce annotations must be handled by experts, yet many clinical groups do not have ready access to skilled AI engineers to tune adapter designs and training recipes. As a result, adaptation cycles can stretch from weeks to months, particularly in few-shot settings. Existing PEFT methods either require manual adapter configuration or automated searches that are computationally infeasible in few-shot 3D settings. We propose SEA-PEFT (SElf-Auditing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning) to automate this process. SEA-PEFT treats adapter configuration as an online allocation problem solved during fine-tuning rather than through manual, fixed-topology choices. SEA-PEFT uses a search-audit-allocate loop that trains active adapters, estimates each adapter's Dice utility by momentarily toggling it off, and then reselects the active set under a parameter budget using a greedy knapsack allocator. Exponential Moving Average and Interquartile Range smoothing, together with a Finite-State Ranking controller, stabilize the loop and improve reliability in high-noise few-shot regimes. On TotalSegmentator and FLARE'22, SEA-PEFT improves mean Dice by 2.4--2.8 points over the strongest fixed-topology PEFT baselines across 1/5/10-shot settings while training <1% of parameters. For reproducibility purposes, we made our code publicly available at https://github.com/tsly123/SEA_PEFT

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

15 samples harvested; 12 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 15 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from tsly123/SEA_PEFT. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.05822, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections