Papers › Attention's Gravitational Field:A Power-Law Interpretation of Positional Correlation
Attention's Gravitational Field:A Power-Law Interpretation of Positional Correlation
Edward Zhang
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
This paper explores the underlying principles of positional relationships and encodings within Large Language Models (LLMs) and introduces the concept of the Attention Gravitational Field (AGF). By decoupling positional encodings from semantic embeddings, we optimize the model architecture and achieve superior accuracy compared to prevailing encoding methods. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth analysis of AGF, demonstrating its intrinsic consistency with learning and stability curves, as well as its empirical alignment with Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. By offering a rigorous theoretical exploration of these phenomena, this work represents a significant step toward interpreting the Attention mechanism and unlocks new possibilities for future research in model optimization and interpretability.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.04805")
Code
Syntology Ran 9 of 12 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 12 samples from 2 repositories, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 9 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 1 of the 12 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
525c2d39941bbce9 · report
729ef446f280b974 · report
d3473dc6f8a2cee8 · report
137d5fd06cd817a4 · report
e62e48a00ed06f63 · report
a14fa691ae6f254a · report
0d802270606c7e37 · report
156ac72eda8c9323 · report
3c73b517864547c4 · report
62f1ce6285ab599b · report
19d46f07e889fbb9 · report
1f873422e04f7352 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.04805, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections