Papers › Guiding Diffusion-based Reconstruction with Contrastive Signals for Balanced Visual...

Guiding Diffusion-based Reconstruction with Contrastive Signals for Balanced Visual Representation

5 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.04803added by Syntology

Boyu Han, Qianqian Xu, Shilong Bao, Zhiyong Yang, Ruochen Cui, Xilin Zhao, Qingming Huang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The limited understanding capacity of the visual encoder in Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) has become a key bottleneck for downstream performance. This capacity includes both Discriminative Ability (D-Ability), which reflects class separability, and Detail Perceptual Ability (P-Ability), which focuses on fine-grained visual cues. Recent solutions use diffusion models to enhance representations by conditioning image reconstruction on CLIP visual tokens. We argue that such paradigms may compromise D-Ability and therefore fail to effectively address CLIP's representation limitations. To address this, we integrate contrastive signals into diffusion-based reconstruction to pursue more comprehensive visual representations. We begin with a straightforward design that augments the diffusion process with contrastive learning on input images. However, empirical results show that the naive combination suffers from gradient conflict and yields suboptimal performance. To balance the optimization, we introduce the Diffusion Contrastive Reconstruction (DCR), which unifies the learning objective. The key idea is to inject contrastive signals derived from each reconstructed image, rather than from the original input, into the diffusion process. Our theoretical analysis shows that the DCR loss can jointly optimize D-Ability and P-Ability. Extensive experiments across various benchmarks and multi-modal large language models validate the effectiveness of our method. The code is available at https://github.com/boyuh/DCR.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from boyuh/DCR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.04803, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology

Syntology's extractor considered 4 leaderboards for this paper and placed the paper on none of them: 2 rejected by the independent check; 2 refused by a rule. What is not shown.

Syntology has checked 6,885 of the 9,623 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections