Papers › Fusion and Grouping Strategies in Deep Learning for Local Climate Zone Classification...
Fusion and Grouping Strategies in Deep Learning for Local Climate Zone Classification of Multimodal Remote Sensing Data
Ancymol Thomas, Jaya Sreevalsan-Nair
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Local Climate Zones (LCZs) give a zoning map to study urban structures and land use and analyze the impact of urbanization on local climate. Multimodal remote sensing enables LCZ classification, for which data fusion is significant for improving accuracy owing to the data complexity. However, there is a gap in a comprehensive analysis of the fusion mechanisms used in their deep learning (DL) classifier architectures. This study analyzes different fusion strategies in the multi-class LCZ classification models for multimodal data and grouping strategies based on inherent data characteristics. The different models involving Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) include: (i) baseline hybrid fusion (FM1), (ii) with self- and cross-attention mechanisms (FM2), (iii) with the multi-scale Gaussian filtered images (FM3), and (iv) weighted decision-level fusion (FM4). Ablation experiments are conducted to study the pixel-, feature-, and decision-level fusion effects in the model performance. Grouping strategies include band grouping (BG) within the data modalities and label merging (LM) in the ground truth. Our analysis is exclusively done on the So2Sat LCZ42 dataset, which consists of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Multispectral Imaging (MSI) image pairs. Our results show that FM1 consistently outperforms simple fusion methods. FM1 with BG and LM is found to be the most effective approach among all fusion strategies, giving an overall accuracy of 76.6\%. Importantly, our study highlights the effect of these strategies in improving prediction accuracy for the underrepresented classes. Our code and processed datasets are available at https://github.com/GVCL/LCZC-MultiModalHybridFusion
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2603.04562")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from GVCL/LCZC-MultiModalHybridFusion. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
d109d4ca27e99f94 · report
11c767b59ac97b81 · report
1ba884f6d4089e7c · report
c105a88c2b3ae9a8 · report
f709315834cb1afa · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.04562, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections