Papers › Lost in Translation: How Language Re-Aligns Vision for Cross-Species Pathology

Lost in Translation: How Language Re-Aligns Vision for Cross-Species Pathology

24 Jan 2026arXiv:2603.04405added by Syntology

Ekansh Arora

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Foundation models are increasingly applied to computational pathology, yet their behavior under cross-cancer and cross-species transfer remains unspecified. This study investigated how fine-tuning CPath-CLIP affects cancer detection under same-cancer, cross-cancer, and cross-species conditions using whole-slide image patches from canine and human histopathology. Performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Few-shot fine-tuning improved same-cancer (64.9% to 72.6% AUC) and cross-cancer performance (56.84% to 66.31% AUC). Cross-species evaluation revealed that while tissue matching enables meaningful transfer, performance remains below state-of-the-art benchmarks (H-optimus-0: 84.97% AUC), indicating that standard vision-language alignment is suboptimal for cross-species generalization. Embedding space analysis revealed extremely high cosine similarity (greater than 0.99) between tumor and normal prototypes. Grad-CAM shows prototype-based models remain domain-locked, while language-guided models attend to conserved tumor morphology. To address this, we introduce Semantic Anchoring, which uses language to provide a stable coordinate system for visual features. Ablation studies reveal that benefits stem from the text-alignment mechanism itself, regardless of text encoder complexity. Benchmarking against H-optimus-0 shows that CPath-CLIP's failure stems from intrinsic embedding collapse, which text alignment effectively circumvents. Additional gains were observed in same-cancer (8.52%) and cross-cancer classification (5.67%). We identified a previously uncharacterized failure mode: semantic collapse driven by species-dominated alignment rather than missing visual information. These results demonstrate that language acts as a control mechanism, enabling semantic re-interpretation without retraining.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ekansh-arora0/cross-species-pathology. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.04405, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections