Papers › Thermodynamic Regulation of Finite-Time Gibbs Training in Energy-Based Models: A...

Thermodynamic Regulation of Finite-Time Gibbs Training in Energy-Based Models: A Restricted Boltzmann Machine Study

3 Mar 2026arXiv:2603.02525added by Syntology

Görkem Can Süleymanoğlu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) are typically trained using finite-length Gibbs chains under a fixed sampling temperature. This practice implicitly assumes that the stochastic regime remains valid as the energy landscape evolves during learning. We argue that this assumption can become structurally fragile under finite-time training dynamics. This fragility arises because, in nonconvex energy-based models, fixed-temperature finite-time training can generate admissible trajectories with effective-field amplification and conductance collapse. As a result, the Gibbs sampler may asymptotically freeze, the negative phase may localize, and, without sufficiently strong regularization, parameters may exhibit deterministic linear drift. To address this instability, we introduce an endogenous thermodynamic regulation framework in which temperature evolves as a dynamical state variable coupled to measurable sampling statistics. Under standard local Lipschitz conditions and a two-time-scale separation regime, we establish global parameter boundedness under strictly positive L2 regularization. We further prove local exponential stability of the thermodynamic subsystem and show that the regulated regime mitigates inverse-temperature blow-up and freezing-induced degeneracy within a forward-invariant neighborhood. Experiments on MNIST demonstrate that the proposed self-regulated RBM substantially improves normalization stability and effective sample size relative to fixed-temperature baselines, while preserving reconstruction performance. Overall, the results reinterpret RBM training as a controlled non-equilibrium dynamical process rather than a static equilibrium approximation.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from cagasolu/sr-trbm. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.02525, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections