Papers › RxnNano:Training Compact LLMs for Chemical Reaction and Retrosynthesis Prediction via...

RxnNano:Training Compact LLMs for Chemical Reaction and Retrosynthesis Prediction via Hierarchical Curriculum Learning

10 Feb 2026arXiv:2603.02215added by Syntology

Ran Li, Shimin Di, Haowei LI, Luanshi Bu, Jiachuan Wang, Wangze Ni, Lei Chen

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Chemical reaction prediction is pivotal for accelerating drug discovery and synthesis planning. Despite advances in data-driven models, current approaches are hindered by an overemphasis on parameter and dataset scaling. Some methods coupled with evaluation techniques that bypass fundamental challenges in reaction representation and fail to capture deep chemical intuition like reaction common sense and {topological atom mapping logic}. We argue that the core challenge lies in instilling these knowledge into the models. To this end, we propose a unified framework that prioritizes chemical understanding over scale through three key innovations: (1) a {Latent Chemical Consistency} objective that models reactions as movements on a continuous chemical manifold, ensuring reversible and physically plausible transformations; (2) a {Hierarchical Cognitive Curriculum} that trains the model through progressive stages, from syntax mastery to semantic reasoning, building robust chemical intuition; (3) {Atom-Map Permutation Invariance (AMPI)}, which force the model to learn invariant relational topology and balance multi-task learning. (4)and structured plan-based reasoning to improve the performance of the LLMs. Our compact {0.5B-parameter model}, \textbf{RxnNano} significantly outperforms fine-tuned LLMs ten times larger (>7B) and all the domain baselines, achieving a 23.5% Top-1 accuracy improvement on rigorous benchmarks without test-time augmentation. https://github.com/rlisml/RxnNano.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from rlisml/RxnNano. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.02215, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections