Papers › PARWiS: Winner determination under shoestring budgets using active pairwise comparisons
PARWiS: Winner determination under shoestring budgets using active pairwise comparisons
Shailendra Bhandari
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Determining a winner among a set of items using active pairwise comparisons under a limited budget is a challenging problem in preference-based learning. The goal of this study is to implement and evaluate the PARWiS algorithm, which shows spectral ranking and disruptive pair selection to identify the best item under shoestring budgets. This work have extended the PARWiS with a contextual variant (Contextual PARWiS) and a reinforcement learning-based variant (RL PARWiS), comparing them against baselines, including Double Thompson Sampling and a random selection strategy. This evaluation spans synthetic and real-world datasets (Jester and MovieLens), using budgets of 40, 60, and 80 comparisons for 20 items. The performance is measured through recovery fraction, true rank of reported winner, reported rank of true winner, and cumulative regret, alongside the separation metric Δ_(1,2). Results show that PARWiS and RL PARWiS outperform baselines across all datasets, particularly in the Jester dataset with a higher Δ_(1,2), while performance gaps narrow in the more challenging MovieLens dataset with a smaller Δ_(1,2). Contextual PARWiS shows comparable performance to PARWiS, indicating that contextual features may require further tuning to provide significant benefits.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.01171, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections