Papers › DeepAFL: Deep Analytic Federated Learning

DeepAFL: Deep Analytic Federated Learning

28 Feb 2026arXiv:2603.00579added by Syntology

Jianheng Tang, Yajiang Huang, Kejia Fan, Feijiang Han, Jiaxu Li, Jinfeng Xu, Run He, Anfeng Liu, Houbing Herbert Song, Huiping Zhuang, Yunhuai Liu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Federated Learning (FL) is a popular distributed learning paradigm to break down data silo. Traditional FL approaches largely rely on gradient-based updates, facing significant issues about heterogeneity, scalability, convergence, and overhead, etc. Recently, some analytic-learning-based work has attempted to handle these issues by eliminating gradient-based updates via analytical (i.e., closed-form) solutions. Despite achieving superior invariance to data heterogeneity, these approaches are fundamentally limited by their single-layer linear model with a frozen pre-trained backbone. As a result, they can only achieve suboptimal performance due to their lack of representation learning capabilities. In this paper, to enable representable analytic models while preserving the ideal invariance to data heterogeneity for FL, we propose our Deep Analytic Federated Learning approach, named DeepAFL. Drawing inspiration from the great success of ResNet in gradient-based learning, we design gradient-free residual blocks in our DeepAFL with analytical solutions. We introduce an efficient layer-wise protocol for training our deep analytic models layer by layer in FL through least squares. Both theoretical analyses and empirical evaluations validate our DeepAFL's superior performance with its dual advantages in heterogeneity invariance and representation learning, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by up to 5.68%-8.42% across three benchmark datasets.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from tangent-heng/DeepAFL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2603.00579, was issued in March 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections