Papers › AnomaMind: Agentic Time Series Anomaly Detection with Tool-Augmented Reasoning
AnomaMind: Agentic Time Series Anomaly Detection with Tool-Augmented Reasoning
Xiaoyu Tao, Yuchong Wu, Mingyue Cheng, Ze Guo, Tian Gao
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Time series anomaly detection is critical in many real-world applications, where effective solutions must localize anomalous regions and support reliable decision-making under complex settings. However, most existing methods frame anomaly detection as a purely discriminative prediction task with fixed feature representations, rather than an evidence-driven diagnostic process. As a result, they often struggle when anomalies exhibit strong context dependence, diverse patterns, or domain shifts across datasets. To address these challenges, we propose AnomaMind, an agentic time series anomaly detection framework that reformulates anomaly detection as a sequential decision-making process. AnomaMind operates through a coarse-to-fine workflow that first localizes suspicious intervals, then constructs diagnostic evidence through tool interaction, and finally refines anomaly decisions through self-reflection. The workflow is supported by a toolkit box that combines knowledge memory and numerical diagnostics: visual anomaly patterns mined from training data and domain knowledge provide contextual guidance, while statistical, value-based, change-based, and region-level operators provide measurable evidence for verification. AnomaMind further adopts a hybrid inference mechanism in which general-purpose models handle flexible reasoning, tool invocation, and refinement, while a detection-specific policy is optimized with rule-based rewards for parsable outputs, F1-score alignment, and false-positive control. Extensive experiments under both in-domain and cross-domain settings demonstrate that AnomaMind consistently improves anomaly detection performance and enhances generalization across heterogeneous anomaly patterns, validating the effectiveness of tool-augmented reasoning for anomaly detection. The code is available at https://github.com/Xiaoyu-Tao/AnomaMind-TS.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2602.13807")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 7 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 7 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
7 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 7 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Xiaoyu-Tao/AnomaMind-TS. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
7c2ba1ee387946e9 · report
cad90f32e4006aa2 · report
ae59a0fd913390d0 · report
c899bd24b1582d49 · report
941f15a5c228ad73 · report
94fd7540ffc5c43c · report
5ed7ae732e853625 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2602.13807, was issued in February 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections